A Wellspring of Opinion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f9c/18f9cbfa1321401fff9942c38fead0bd3e404f7d" alt=""
For more than 22 years, I’ve been dropping rocks down the well of the gear industry’s public opinion. Most every issue, I drop another rock. Sometimes I think I hear a faint splash, but most times I just wait.
However, my editorial in the November/December 2005 issue (“Is Gear Expo Worth It?”) splashed so hard and so loud, it seems like the water is ready to gush over the top. Admittedly, the rock was a bit larger than normal, and it caused a lot of reaction—from AGMA board members as well as members of the gear manufacturing community.
Having recently returned from the AGMA annual meeting, I can confirm that the level has, indeed, risen—substantially. The rock—my editorial—was just the catalyst in getting people thinking and talking about the role of both the AGMA and the Gear Expo. In the two days I was in Tucson for the annual meeting, members told me “you’re asking the questions that need to be asked,” “you hit the nail on the head,” and “keep up the good work.”
While it’s nice to be congratulated for getting things rolling, what’s needed is a continued open discussion. Last week I met with several members of the AGMA board, and I’m confident after that meeting that the association’s leadership is asking the right questions, not just about Gear Expo, but also about the role of the association in the success of its members.
But the officers and board of the AGMA can’t help you unless you’re willing to help yourselves. What they need most is the input of the gear manufacturing community. In this forum, we’ve already discussed Gear Expo, so I’d like to turn the discussion toward the association itself. What I’d like to know is how well the AGMA is meeting your needs.
The AGMA states the following mission on its website: “To help members compete more effectively in today’s global marketplace.”