At first sight the appearance of 5-axis milling for bevel gears opens new possibilities in flank form
design. Since in comparison to existing machining methods applying cutter heads no kinematic
restrictions exist for 5-axis milling technology, any flank form can be machined.
Nevertheless the basic requirements for bevel gears did not change. Specifications and functional
requirements like load carrying capacity and running behavior are still increasing demands for design
and manufacturing. This paper describes the demands for gear design and gives an overview about
different design principles in the context of the surrounding periphery of the gear set.
In the design process of transmissions, one major criterion is the
resulting noise emission of the powertrain due to gear excitation.
Within the past years, much investigation has shown that the
noise emission can be attributed to quasi-static transmission error.
Therefore, the transmission error can be used for a tooth contact
analysis in the design process, as well as a characteristic value for
quality assurance by experimental inspections.
Excessive machine tool vibration during a precision grinding operation can result in poor workpiece quality in the form of chatter, rough finishes, burn, etc. One possible reason for
excessive vibration is directly associated with the relationship
between natural frequencies of a machine tool system and the
operating speed of the grinding wheel spindle.
This proposed standard would not make any recommendations
regarding the required quality for any application. The
intent is to establish standard pre-finish quality classes for typical
finishing operations, which only include the inspection elements
that are important to properly evaluate pre-finish gear
quality as it applies to the finishing operation. It would be the
responsibility of the manufacturing/process engineer, quality
engineer, or other responsible individual to establish the
required pre-finish quality class for their application.
This paper demonstrates an application of the tooth interior fatigue fracture (TIFF) analysis method, as implemented in SMT's MASTA software, in which loaded tooth contact analysis (LTCA) results from a specialized 3-D contact model have been utilized to determine the load boundary conditions for analysis of tooth flank fracture (TFF).
The common calculation methods according to DIN 3990 and
ISO 6336 are based on a comparison of occurring stress and
allowable stress. The influence of gear size on the load-carrying
capacity is considered with the size factors YX (tooth root bending)
and ZX (pitting), but there are further influences, which
should be considered.
In the following, major influences of gear size on the load factors
as well as on the permissible tooth root bending and contact
stress will be discussed.
This paper addresses the lubrication of helical gears - especially
those factors influencing lubricant film thickness and pressure.
Contact between gear teeth is protected by the elastohydrodynamic
lubrication (EHL) mechanism that occurs between nonconforming
contact when pressure is high enough to cause large
increases in lubricant viscosity due to the pressure-viscosity
effect, and changes of component shape due to elastic deflection.
Acting together, these effects lead to oil films that are stiff
enough to separate the contacting surfaces and thus prevent
significant metal-to-metal contact occurring in a well-designed
gear pair.
The increasing demands in the automotive
industry for weight reduction, fuel
efficiency and a reduced carbon footprint need to be addressed urgently. Up until now, widely used conventional steels have lived up to expectations. However, with more stringent emissions standards,
demands on materials are increasing.
Materials are expected to perform better, resulting in a need for increased fatigue strength. A possibility to increase torque
on current generations without design
changes can be achieved by selecting suitable materials.
Gear-loaded tooth contact analysis is an important tool for the design and analysis of gear performance within transmission and driveline systems. Methods for the calculation of tooth contact conditions have been discussed in the literature for many years. It's possible the method you've been using is underestimating transmission error in helical gears. Here's why.